beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.05.17 2018나52159

부당이득금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The portion concerning the claim for return of unjust enrichment of KRW 90 million

A. (1) The plaintiff (A) decided to purchase the pension and site owned by the defendant's wife E and E, which is the defendant's wife, and the plaintiff's claim (A) refers to the "the Schedule of this case" below on August 8, 2016 and May 12, 2017.

Upon entering into a sales contract on the same land and buildings as mentioned above, the sales price pursuant to the sales contract Nos. 1 of the table Nos. 1 shall be KRW 1.8 billion, and the sales price pursuant to the sales contract No. 2 of the table No. 2 shall be KRW 515 million, respectively, and the Plaintiff acquired all the collateral collateral obligations of the above real estate E and paid the remainder in the sales price.

(14) On August 5, 2016, the sales contract of No. 1 of the table No. 2 of this case was 00 million won, and the sales contract of No. 2 of the table No. 2 of this case was hereinafter “the second sales contract”). On August 5, 2016, an indication of real estate no. 1782/7468m2, which was 7468m2, P. I., 3, 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won (hereinafter “No. 1,000,000,000,000,000) was 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won (hereinafter “No. 1,000,000,000).

(C) On August 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 2016, the Plaintiff was a family member of v.g., who is well aware of the penalty; and (b) the amount of the instant collateral obligation is one hundred million won.