beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.11.08 2016고정1271

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant driven Bone Star Cargo Vehicles.

On June 4, 2016, at around 07:28, the Defendant driven the above vehicle, and proceeded at a speed below speed, depending on one lane, toward the front side of the iron farm apartment 13 complexes located in the iron farm in the iron farm in the front of the iron farm 13 complexes, from the side of the iron farm commercial area, to the side of the eight complexes of the iron farm apartment.

In such cases, drivers have a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering direction and brakes well, and to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant conflicts on the left side of the running direction of the Defendant with the part of the left side of the Dunst vehicle owned by the victim C (V, 58 years old) who was parked on the road in front of 718-dong, the left side of the Dunst vehicle owned by the victim C (V, South and 58 years old), and due to the shock, conflicts with the front part of the F FF Rad vehicle owned by the victim E (V, 31 years old, South and North) who was parked later with the back part of the FF Rad vehicle parked later. The Defendant continued to stop on the 1323 street in front of the iron-gu 1323 street, and was parked behind, and was driven by the victim G (Y, 34 years old) who was driven by the victim G (the front part of the HM vehicle driven by the victim) after driving the front part of the HMW vehicle.

The Defendant, at the above occupational negligence, destroyed the above DM vehicle to be equivalent to KRW 3,043,128 at its repair cost, and destroyed the above HW vehicle at its repair cost, and escaped without taking any measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of C, E, and G;

1. Application of each written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts; and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's reason for sentencing is the owner of the passenger car driven by the above victim G.