beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.11.17 2015고단2672

부정수표단속법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 30, 1993, the Defendant opened an account with the East capital branch and the current account from Essi (SC) Seoul Bank and issued a check of shares.

around January 8, 2006, the Defendant issued 12 copies of the check number “D,” issuance date “D, April 8, 2006,” “2,00,000 won” at the office of “C” in the Defendant’s operation of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul’s 1st century 34, and issued 12 copies of the check number “C” from that time to February 13, 2006, as indicated in the separate crime list, from that time, and presented 84,50,000 per share amount per share amount per 84,50,000 won per face value, and presented the check to the holders within the time limit for payment, but did not receive the check due to each disposition of suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The letter of accusation and the number of shares per party;

1. Application of immigration Acts and subordinate statutes on individuals;

1. Article 2(2) and (1) of the former Control of Illegal Check Act (amended by Act No. 10185, Sep. 24, 2010); the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. Of concurrent offenders, the sentence shall be imposed in consideration of unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the amount of the checks in this case is equivalent to the amount of the checks in this case for the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act, or that the Defendant did not recover from the victim despite the fact that the checks were withdrawn before the date on which the payment was presented, and that the Defendant escaped from the country immediately before the date on which the checks were presented, and the Defendant is the primary offender; the Defendant confessions all of the crimes in this case and reflects their depth; the Defendant’s failure to receive the credit payment from the retail, due to favorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, and all