beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.05.17 2017가단90717

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The fact that the Defendant did not dispute, at the Plaintiff Company that runs the manufacture of electricity, electronic products, and wholesale and retail business, worked as a contractual position from October 12, 2015 to December 22, 2015, from October 17, 2016 to December 29, 2016, and was employed as a full-time employee on April 28, 2017, and retired from office until July 28, 2017. The Defendant, around April 2017, connected the Plaintiff Company’s products with the main body of the BEMK-01-1 eye (hereinafter referred to as “the instant eye of the snow of this case”), and used it as a dispute between the parties.

2. Determination

A. (1) On April 2017, Plaintiff Company: (i) conducted an investigation into the above eyeme 200 work performed by the Defendant from July 10, 2017 to July 26, 2017; (ii) two employees of the Plaintiff Company were placed in order to determine whether the main body of the instant eye studio was defective; (iii) 20 hours from August 2017 to September 26, 201; (iv) 10 hours from August 201 to August 26, 201; (iv) 3 times from August 2017 to 3 times from August 201; and (v) 8 hours from August 2017 to June 3, 206 to June 3, 206 to determine whether the main body of the instant snow studio was damaged; and (v) other employees were required to pay the Plaintiff Company’s allowances to be paid to the Plaintiff Company 1 to the employees of the Plaintiff 2 and the employees of the Plaintiff 3 months from March 2.