1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of all the charges of this case (excluding the portion without charge) on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the meaning of election campaign under the Act on Election Campaign by Public Organizations,

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the record, the lower court was justifiable to have rendered a not-guilty verdict on the grounds that there was no proof of a crime regarding the violation of the Act on Entrusted Elections, such as public organizations due to the time limit for transmitting text messages among the facts charged in the instant case, on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.