근로기준법위반등
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
The defendant in the factory room is an employer who ordinarily employs five workers under the trade name of Kimhae-si B from Kimhae-si to C, and engages in the business of manufacturing plastic withdrawal type.
D (E) On June 18, 2010, D (E; hereinafter referred to as “E”) joined and worked as production workers under the above C, and retired on January 1, 2013.
Although the Defendant retired on January 1, 2013 by E, the Defendant did not pay KRW 400,000 in total, the wage of KRW 1,909,530 in October 2012, and KRW 3,307,790 in total, and the amount of retirement pay of KRW 2,127,963 in December 98, and the amount of KRW 2,127,963 in total, including the wage of KRW 98,260 in October 1, 201, within 14 days from the date on which the cause for payment occurred, without agreement between the parties
It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason that the dismissal of the defendant's intention to punish the defendant against each anti-presidential worker is more than a judgment (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act).