채무부존재확인
1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
Suwon District Court Decision 2015 Godan555 dated 201.
A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.
Basic Facts
The defendant is a social welfare foundation established for the purpose of operating living facilities for the disabled, and the plaintiff works as the head of facilities of C, which is the vocational rehabilitation facilities for the disabled belonging to the defendant from April 1, 201 to February 5, 2015, and has overall control over C's affairs, such as application and execution of subsidies, and the selection of a trader.
(1) The Plaintiff’s tort 1) around July 2012, with the representative director N of M, the Defendant’s partner company, for the purpose of securing the continuous and stable import structure of prospective social enterprises and supporting the establishment of a foundation for self-reliance from Korea, Gyeonggi-do, and Yangyang-gun, the Defendant’s business to be implemented to receive the above subsidies (hereinafter referred to as “instant development project”).
10,000,000 won, in consultation with the competent authorities to receive money excluding value-added tax, and C, who works as the head of the facility, made a false application for subsidies and other documents, and received subsidies from the competent authorities as if C had worked as the head of the facility, and received subsidies from the competent authorities, and received a return of the remainder from the N.
Despite that the Plaintiff was thought to have used 5 million won for the production of a de facto clock for publicity, on August 24, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for each of the subsidies of KRW 15 million in total, including KRW 7.5 million around October 15, 2012 and KRW 7.5 million around December 10, 2012, to the review committee members of the Gyeonggi-do Job Policy Council for Job, KRW 3.5.2 million, the cost of sampling production, KRW 7.48 million, and the cost of production of a clock for public relations, and filed an application for each subsidy of KRW 15 million,5 million, including KRW 7.5 million, around December 10, 2012.
As above, the plaintiff deceivings a public official in charge of the Yangyang-gun Office, and is in its jurisdiction from the Republic of Korea, Gyeonggi-do, and Yangyang-gun through the above public official.