난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The grounds alleged by the Plaintiffs in the first instance court are not different from the allegations in the first instance court, and the first instance court’s judgment rejecting the Plaintiffs’ claims even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court, which was additionally submitted in the first instance court, is examined together with the Plaintiffs’ assertion.
Therefore, the reasoning for this Court regarding this case is as follows: (a) under the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “Congogogo” in the 12th sentence is dismissed as “the Democratic Republic of Congo (hereinafter “the Democratic Republic of Congo”); and (b) the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same, except for the deletion of “the above plaintiffs” in the 3th sentence, and therefore, (c) under Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of
2. If so, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is dismissed due to the lack of reason, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Thus, the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed due to the lack of reason.