When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) in the female correctional institution C located in 107 in the South Eupn-ro of South Eupn-ro on November 14, 2016, and (b) in the course of being investigated as a disturbance in D, the Defendant said that he was sexual harassment.

I think that I did not attend the ethicization, and broken the ethic of the ethic paid in prison.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A work report for each worker;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to four copies of evidence photographs, CCTV video images CDs;

1. Article 141 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of himself/herself in a prison during his/her prison period; and (b) the relevant correctional officer’s attitude of failing to reflect his/her mistake after committing the instant crime; (c) the Defendant should be punished strictly; (d) the Defendant reflects his/her mistake late or late; and (e) the value of the public property damaged by the Defendant is relatively insignificant.