beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.11.19 2013고정1039

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 1.5 million won;

2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a low-priced motor vehicle B.

At around 02:00 on April 1, 2013, the Defendant proceeded at a speed of 30 km from the breadth bridge to the eth eth breadth of 13 degrees from the eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth m.

In such a case, the driver of any motor vehicle who intends to enter the intersection is a road crossing where the width of the intersection is wider than that of the road where the motor vehicle is traveling, and when there is another motor vehicle who intends to enter the intersection where the width is wider than that of the road where the vehicle is traveling, the driver of any motor vehicle who intends to drive the intersection shall yield the course to the other motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant received the part of the right-hand fences of the victim C (Woo, 38 years old) driving D E (Woo) who entered the intersection from the left-hand side of the Defendant’s running direction to the right-hand side, and received it as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and received it as the part of the victim and the victim E (Woo, 31 years old), who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle, for about three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A traffic accident report and a traffic accident report (1) actual condition investigation report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of statutes, such as site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

3. Selection of an alternative fine;

4. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

5. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above.