If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

1. On February 21, 2017, from around 02:50 to 03:50, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as: (b) from the victim D’s cafeteria to the game in both cities; (c) the victim D, seated with the table of the table of other customers; and (d) smoking tobacco; and (d) the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act from February 21, 2017 to October 06:10, 2017, the Defendant died of a bitched bitched bitched bitched at the F office of the F office of the 1699 Yang-ro Police Station, both of which are under the influence of alcohol, to police officers, etc. in the state of economic peace.

The inside of his clothes is off.

It was difficult for government offices to avoid disturbance under the influence of alcohol, such as taking a bath, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with Business, Selection of Imprisonment, and Selection of Punishment), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (Violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Selection of Fine) concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 3 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are divided into crimes, and the facts that the defendant agreed with the injured party of paragraph (1) are favorable to the defendant, and the facts that the defendant has the same record several times shall be considered disadvantageous to the defendant, taking into account the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, and taking into account all other factors of sentencing as shown in the pleading, and determining the sentence as ordered.