beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.03.30 2015고단2566

재물손괴등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 15, 2015, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property by removing D, a stude, who was under the influence of alcohol before the victim C (nives, 79 years of age)’s house located in Heungung-gun B (nives), with the stone with the stone with the stone with the stone with the stone with the stone with the view to the entrance of the damaged party’s entrance, and destroying the victim’s property by destroying one glass of the entrance entrance, the market value of which is owned by the victim.

2. On November 5, 2015, at the place indicated in paragraph 1, around 18:35, the Defendant: (a) the police officer, who was a police officer of the Goung Police Station E (a police box) dispatched after receiving a report of 112 pertaining to the case of damage to property at the place indicated in paragraph 1; and (b) the Defendant asked the Defendant of the occurrence of the instant case; and (c) the Defendant “p

The F was arrested as a flagrant offender with the suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties by taking one time by hand the part of the F with the desire to “this son.”

After the Defendant was arrested as above, and carried out to the E police box located in the Southern-gun G, the Defendant expressed to the above F, etc., “this son H. H. H. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. at one time

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

Article 366 (Destruction of Property) and Article 136 (1) (Interference with the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Punishment of Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) (Article 62(1) of the Social Service Order Act (Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, considering the fact that a defendant commits any contingent crime under the influence of alcohol, the fact that the defendant is a criminal who commits any wrongful act, the fact that the defendant is closely against his/her mistake, and the fact that the defendant is the first offender, etc.) of the Social Service Order Act