2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable circumstance that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, the defendant deposited 2 million won for the victim of injury, the defendant's deposit of phiphones, the number of times of the administration of phiphones, the upper line that supplied phiphones to himself after being detained due to the crime of this case, and the drug criminal who was supplied with phiphones from himself, and the defendant's information, actively cooperates with the investigation, such as restrictions on certain narcotics offenders, and the defendant seems to be responsible for care for his children who are not healthy health or in middle school. However, even though the defendant had the record of the crime of narcotics, the crime of this case is administered twice, despite the fact that the defendant had a considerable amount of phiphonephones, and carried with a considerable amount of phiphones, and the defendant inflicted injury on women who promised marriage at once, and the victim's family relation and defense counsel's mental and physical harm were not easily known, and the crime of this case did not reach the age of unfair sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.