손해배상(기)
1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.
The defendant.
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff is the resident of two weeks B Apartment 101, 2004 (hereinafter "the apartment of this case"), and the defendant is the council of occupants' representatives of the above B apartment.
B. On March 28, 2012, water leakage occurred on the instant apartment and the instant apartment and water 1904, which are the lower floor. In the instant apartment, damage, such as living room, kitchen, kitchen, kitchen, remote area, and fung, etc., was inflicted on the instant apartment.
C. The Defendant designated C as a repair company. Before the repair of the apartment of this case, the Defendant commenced the repair of the wall cracks of 1904, in a way of preventing a waterproof hole, and the said waterproof amount was damaged by the electric power distribution line, the stormer board, the boiler, etc. of the apartment of this case.
After July 2012, the apartment in this case occurred again, and the Plaintiff spent KRW 200,000 as the inspection cost to clarify the cause of water leakage.
E. On the other hand, B.
The estimated amount of compensation for damage to a port is KRW 710,000.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 7, Eul evidence 2 to 7 (including each number), each entry and video of Gap evidence 2 to 7 (including each number), witness D's testimony and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion against the Defendant is seeking payment of KRW 2.7 million out of the total sum of KRW 5.34 million for mental damage compensation of KRW 2.7 million for property damage compensation (i.e., cost of restoring a remote area, KRW 700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000 won, and damages for delay).
B. According to the purport of the above-mentioned facts and the entire arguments cited in the above-mentioned part of the judgment, the defendant is entitled to KRW 910,000 (i.e., cost of recovery from remote areas and the market, KRW 710,000), barring special circumstances, and the plaintiff is entitled to seek such cost.