대여금
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B is the Defendant B with respect to each of the above amounts of KRW 100,000,000 and KRW 50,000,000 for Defendant D and E, respectively.
1. As to the Plaintiff’s respective claims against Defendant B, C, D, and E
A. (1) Determination of the cause of the claim 1) Each of the loan certificates of August 20, 2007 (hereinafter “the loan certificates of August 20, 2007”) shall be each of the loan certificates of this case.
(1) Under the title of “B, on August 20, 2007, the upper reporter himself borrowed KRW 100,000 from the creditor’s net H (hereinafter “the deceased”) and KRW 50,000,000 from each of the Defendant B, Defendant D, and E, respectively, and delivered to the Deceased; Defendant B, Inc., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”).
(1) As the representative director of the company, Defendant C is the wife of Defendant B, Defendant D is the mother of Defendant B, Defendant D is the mother of Defendant B, and KRW 200 million paid from the deceased (hereinafter referred to as “instant KRW 200 million”).
The facts that I used as operating funds of this case, I prepared and delivered a cash tea certificate of KRW 200 million to the deceased. The cash tea certificate of this case contains interest rate of August 19, 2008, and 18% (1.5% per annum). Defendant C signed and sealed the cash tea certificate of this case as joint guarantor without dispute between the above parties, and Defendant C made payment of KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000.
Therefore, barring any special circumstance, Defendant C is a KRW 200 million, Defendant B, D, and .