beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.06.10 2015구합79376

정직처분취소

Text

1. The Defendant’s disciplinary action for three months of suspension from office against the Plaintiff on July 1, 2015 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On January 15, 1993, the Plaintiff is appointed as the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Local Civil Engineering Manual, and has served as the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Safety Construction Traffic Bureau Facilities and the Local Facilities Assistant Inspector from August 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015.

The defendant is the director of the planning and economy bureau of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Council and the director of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Council C and D et al.

From February 26, 2015 to February 26, 2015, with the husband F and F husband of the representative director E

3. Until March 2, 200, a golf trip was operated by an ombudsman with China-Namnam-ro, thereby violating Article 6-2 of the former Code of Conduct for Public Officials (hereinafter referred to as the “B-Gu Code of Conduct”).

Around March 15, 2015, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Personnel Committee demanded a resolution on disciplinary action to the First Personnel Committee. On the same ground, on June 15, 2015, the first personnel committee of Seoul Special Metropolitan City violated Article 53 of the Local Public Officials Act and Article 6-2 of the former Code of Conduct, which is deemed to fall under grounds for disciplinary action under Article 69(1) of the Local Public Officials Act, and the Defendant made a resolution on disciplinary action for three months of suspension from office on July 1, 2015 (hereinafter “instant disposition”). D. The Plaintiff appealed against the instant disposition and filed a petition with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Local Appeal Committee, but was dismissed on August 7, 2015. [The grounds for recognition] There was no dispute with the Plaintiff, and the purport of entry into the relevant construction work with Gap 1, 2, and 5 (including serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of each of the instant disposition, which is clearly related to the Plaintiff’s performance of the pertinent disposition’s duties as a public official.