However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 20, 2019, the Defendant: (a) was located in Kimpo-si B at Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, around 23:05 on April 20, 2019; (b) reported 112 to the effect that “I do not have any male seat”; and (c) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by assaulting the police officer’s left hand when he was solicited to return home from E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Investigation report (for verification of moving pictures) and screen pictures attached thereto;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including favorable circumstances, etc. among the reasons for sentencing following the suspended sentence);

1. The scope of recommendations on the sentencing criteria [the range of recommendations] [the scope of punishment of recommending] the basic area [the scope of punishment of recommending] 6 months from 6 months to 1 year and 6 months; and

2. Determination of sentence: Determination of sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, probation one year following the suspension of execution, and all the sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, background of the crime and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as the order.

Unfavorable circumstances: Price the head of the police officer who is performing his/her duty properly and thus interferes with the performance of his/her duties is not easy.

The favorable circumstances: It is difficult to view it as a planned crime in light of the background of the crime, the fact that the defendant was living in the state of being committed, and the attitude after the crime.

There is no record of punishment for the same or similar crime.

The crime was led to confession.

The mistake is divided.