However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] On June 28, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) from the Incheon District Court. On August 7, 2007, the same court received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving).

[2] On June 25, 2017, the Defendant driven a coo car in B while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.080% during blood while under the influence of alcohol content of about 1km from the front of the road of 477-4 Han-ro, Cheong-ro, 72, Cheong-ro, Cheong-ro, Cheong-ro, 52, to the front of the road of the same Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on arrest and a statement in the circumstances of driving in the main place;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiry statements, investigation reports (formers and confirmations) and Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence has three times the same career as that of the defendant, and that he/she has two times the previous records of punishment for non-licensed driving, the defendant's responsibility is not

However, the past history is relatively old and has been punished by a fine, and the degree of the crime is not much serious, such as the drinking volume and driving distance of this case, and the defendant is currently divided into his/her own mistake, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence,