When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 21, 2020, the defendant filed a complaint with the head of the management office (D), the head of the management office (D), the head of the resident representative office (C), the head of the resident representative office (C), the head of the resident representative office (C), the resident representative office (C), the resident representative office (C), the resident representative office (C), the resident representative office (C), the resident representative office (C) filed a complaint against the victim by stating the following false facts: (a) the victim C operated the apartment council under the law; (b) embezzlement, embezzlement [illegal diversion] of management expenses; and (c) the misappropriation; and (c) the resident representative office (C); and (c) the resident representative office (C); and (c) the resident representative office (C); and (c) the embezzlement; (c) the misappropriation; and (d) the misappropriation; and (d) the misappropriation; and (d) the victim’s request for special inspection (inspection) the misappropriation; and (d) the victim publicly posted the management expenses.

Summary of Evidence

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the documents sent by the police testimony and viewing of the defendant's legal statement C, records of the council of occupants' representatives, leaflet attached by the suspect, and disbursement resolution;

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.