A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for six months, for Defendant B, and for Defendant D, for four months, for Defendant E, and for F, for each fine.

1. The defendants' status relationships

A. From July 1, 1998, Defendant A: (a) from around July 1, 1998, three tower box; (b) STB and Personeron Vo Red Cross; (c) PVR refers to a device receiving broadcasting signals; (d) STB refers to a device receiving broadcasting signals; and (e) PVR refers to three-to-stops (SB); and (e) compared to STB, PVR operates as a representative director of the victim M& Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “M”), which is the company developing the product value, while working as the research institute, and (e) he retires from July 22, 2005; and (e) around September 15, 2005, he/she establishes and operates NN (hereinafter “N representative director”) for the same purpose of developing the product.

B. Defendant B served as the head of the O planning office, which is a multimedia development company, and around October 2005, when N was merged with N around October 2005, and is working as the head of the NO research institute, and is responsible for the research and development of products, and manage N development servers and file servers.

C. Defendant C was employed as a member of M on September 1, 200 and was in charge of overseas business operations on August 31, 2005, and was employed as N from that time after starting N around September 2005.

Defendant

D Around March 1, 200, he/she was in charge of the development of hardware by entering M and leaving around May 2, 2006. Around May 2, 2006, when he/she was in charge of the development of hardware, he/she was in charge of the development of hardware by entering N and entering P Co., Ltd., a N's partner from May 2, 2006, and was in charge of the development of hardware.

E. Defendant E was in charge of the development of hardware by entering M around July 28, 2003, and was set off around August 11, 2006, and was in charge of the development of hardware from August 28, 2006, while taking the form of joining P Co., Ltd. from August 2006, Defendant E was actually engaged in N and was in charge of the development of hardware.

F. Defendant F entered around January 2003 and was in charge of software development. Defendant F around April 20, 2007.