2. Determination is a favorable condition for the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized and reflected the instant crime, the fact that the Defendant’s wife and children wanted to have the Defendant’s wife, and the fact that the Defendant’s wife’s health appears to be not good.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant has been punished several times due to driving without a license or driving without a license, was sentenced three times to the suspension of the sentence of imprisonment due to drinking driving, etc., and even if he was sentenced two times due to drinking driving or driving without a license, he was sentenced to the crime of this case, and the blood alcohol concentration and the blood alcohol concentration are very high to 0.219%.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and the environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable and unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.