beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.12.13 2017구합83591

업무정지처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 16, 2005, the Plaintiff was engaged in the import and distribution of medical appliances with the permission from the Defendant pursuant to Articles 6 and 15 of the Medical Devices Act, under the trade name “B” from the Defendant.

B. On August 30, 2016, the Seoul Customs Office notified the Defendant of the content of the non-import of medical devices in compliance with the criminal fact that “the Defendant, as if the goods already permitted were imported, submitted a standard customs clearance scheduled report as if they were imported.”

C. On October 24, 2017, the Defendant imported the Plaintiff from 1, 2017 on or before reporting it as a medical device (hereinafter “facts”), 1, 3, 4, 1, 5, 1, 4, 5, 1, 5, 6, 1, 1, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6, 1, 5, 1, 4, 1, 5, 1, 5, 1, 6, 5, 1, 6, 1, 5, 1, 6, 5, 1, 6, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 4, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 2, 10, 4, 16, 1, 4, 2, 4, 1, 1, 4, 1, 4,