2. One-on-board, although the defendant recognized his mistake and surrendered it to the investigation agency, the defendant can only be sentenced to a fine of double-class. However, in the course of committing the crime of occupational embezzlement more than 500 million won, the case is more severe, and the method of adding up the crime of forging the document of this case is not good, and there is no circumstance in which the damage was restored, and there is no circumstance in which the damage was restored. In full view of all other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records, including the details and the background of the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, occupation, etc., the sentence of the judgment below is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.