When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 21, 2014, at around 01:25, the Defendant continued to use a Handphone in the Incheon Western Police Station’s office located in Seo-gu Incheon Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, for the reason that the Defendant’s Handphone and the distribution of the Defendant’s Handphones located in the back seat of the car of the Defendant’s workplace, which was under drinking control, do not exist. In addition, even though the Defendant received several proposals from B of the above Handphones and the Defendant “on the Handphones and the exhauster,” the Defendant continued to use the handphones in the above Handphones on the books where the police officer was seated.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to traffic investigation activities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include the confession and reflection of the crime in this case, the fact that the defendant has no record of the same kind of crime or suspended execution, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime in this case, circumstances after the crime, etc., as ordered.