However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 4, 2011, the Defendant forged private document: (a) stated “the purchase price of land and construction cost for the D Apartment Development Project at the time of departure” in the item column for the resolution of the Council of the Council of the Council without authority (State) at the time B Apartment 807, 801, and (b) without authority; and (c) marks E and F seals prepared in advance on the name side of F.

For the purpose of exercising this, the Defendant forged a letter of resolution by the board of directors, which was made in the name of E or F, a private document concerning certification of facts.

2. Around November 4, 2011, the Defendant held a false resolution of the board of directors, as set out in paragraph 1, at the 3 main points adjacent to Goyang-gu Dang-dong Bridge G G located adjacent to Goyang-gu Dayang-dong Bridge-dong, Goyang-si, Goyang-si.

3. On November 22, 2011, the Defendant made a certified judicial scrivener I to apply for the change of the director’s title on the corporate register of the ICC even though he/she did not hold a provisional shareholders’ meeting at the Goyang-dong District Court Goyang-dong District Court Goyang-dong Branch Branch of the Goyang-dong District District Court (U.S.) on November 22, 201, that “I will retire from office on March 31, 2011 of the auditor E, retired from office on March 23, 2011 of the directors JJ, retired from office on March 23, 201 of the director F, retired from office on March 23, 2011 of the director K, appointed from office on November 22, 2011 of the director A, appointed from office on November 22, 2011 of the director director, and director L on November 21, 2011.”

Accordingly, the registry official who is not aware of the fact was computerized in order to change the directors and auditors of the CC corporate register.

In this way, the defendant made a false report to the public official to record false facts in the corporate register which is the same electronic records as the original of the notarial deed.

4. The Defendant had the Defendant keep the corporate register of the said Section C in the same time and place as that set forth in paragraph (3) and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. A complaint;

1. Board of directors resolution;