If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. Around September 28, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents at the office of “D” located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “E”, “E, resident registration number column, “H” in “E, and “E” in the customer address column, and “E” in “E”, “82,800” in the mobile phone subscription column, “LT72” in the mobile phone subscription column, “LT72” in “LT, resident registration number column, “E” in “E”, “E” in the customer address column, “H” in “E” and “E” and “E” in the customer address column, “Seoul National University of Gyeonggi-gu”, “Seoul National University” and “Seoul National University”, “Seoul National Bank name”, “Seoul National Bank name”, “The date on which the date on which the applicant’s entry into the mobile phone subscription column,” and “The date on which the applicant’s signature was made in the column 2012.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged an application for joining a mobile phone in the name of E, a private document concerning rights and duties without authority.

2. The Defendant, at the above F office on a temporary basis, had an employee, who could not know the F’s name, who was unaware of the forgery of the application for opening a mobile phone as above, deliver one copy of the application for opening a forged mobile phone as if it were duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised a forged private document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. The prosecutor's statement to K;

1. Each police statement of L/M;

1. A report on investigation (N telephone investigation);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of application;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment, and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of uttering of falsified Investigation Documents), respectively;