The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

1. Defendant A is a person who served as an officer in charge of personnel management in the planning and management division of the E Office of Education from July 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010; Defendant A is a person who served as the head of the planning and management division of the E Office of Education from July 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010 (the name is changed to the administrative management division around July 1, 2012).

Defendant

A, together with F, shall assist the vice Superintendent of E Office of Education, who is the confirmation of the performance rating of local public officials of Grade V in E Office of Education. When assisting the work of the vice Superintendent of E Office of Education for the verification of performance rating, he/she shall prepare a book of evaluation of objectively order and performance rating based on work experience and work performance ability, and shall not prepare a book of evaluation of performance rating, and shall not prepare, without any objective basis, a book of evaluation of performance rating for the persons subject to promotion in advance, so that they may enter into the same within the scope of promotion multiple.

Nevertheless, Defendant A, at the office of general affairs of the E Office of Education located in G on July 1, 2010, ordered the E Office of Education’s official H and I belonging to the E Office of Education to prepare a proposal for examination and decision of work performance rating points for local public officials of Grade V or below at the end of June 2010, stating the heat and work performance rating points in order to promote H and I as a library from the personnel affairs of January 1, 201 to the personnel affairs of the E Office of Education.

As a result, J made a 2010 Formula 5 officers, including H and I, and as a result, H and I’s order based on the results of the five evaluations prior to the performance rating performance rating for the first half of the year 2010 are merely 32 parts and 33 parts, respectively, and even if H and I were to give any higher performance rating points to H and I during the first half of the year 2010.