However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final.

D is a person who operates the F Gameland Game Center in Busan Young-gu E, and the defendant A is the head of the above game room, and the defendant B is the employee of the above game room.

No one shall provide game products for the distribution or use, the contents of which are different from those classified by the Game Rating Board, or display or store such products for such purposes.

A game product "non-satis" is carried out by means of acquiring points by putting a water flag appearing on the left and right of the screen, so it requires active participation of the oil reservoir and is classified by the Game Rating Board as pure ability game that is unable to obtain high points in simple manipulation or external devices, etc., and the game progress is carried out in a way of discharging free gifts if it is possible to put the surface into the catra window, and the number of times it is possible to run the game in the catra hold, and the launcher is divided into a launcher in the operation of a catra, and if it obtains points more than 5,000 points, it is carried out in the way of discharging free gifts.

1. From November 3, 201 to July 22:50 of the same year, Defendant A and D received a rating from the said game room to “a pure ability game which is absolutely unable to obtain free gifts without user’s manipulation,” Defendant and D provided 35 types of “non-use game”, the content of which was changed to “a game, regardless of user’s ability, is automatically carried out, and the result of the game is determined by an incidental method irrespective of user’s ability.”

Accordingly, the defendant provided game products different from the classified game products in collusion with D.

2. Defendant B from November 6, 2011 to the same month

7. From 22:50 to the above game site, providing D and A with game products different from the contents rated in D and A for use shall assist them.