The defendant pays 100 million won to the applicant for compensation by fraud.

3.2

[2014 Highest 487] The Defendant stated, around November 11, 2012, that “G” on the second floor of the shopping mall in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, referred to as “the victim E is a management support business entity of KT, an incorporated H, the president of KT, who is a vice-chairperson of H, who is ordered to handle the closed cable from KT to the Association, and that he will again handle the work at I scheduled to be established. To this end, the Defendant said that “the money to be used for the business fund is required to be loaned KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.”

However, the facts were that the defendant was not the regular manager of KT's management support, and there was no intention or ability to allow the victim to handle the waste cable.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 100 million from the victim on November 13, 2012 to the J account of the Defendant, the representative of which was the Defendant.

[2014 Highest 1368]

1. On June 12, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime of June 12, 2012, at the K control point located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Franchisa around the beginning of June 2012, the Defendant concluded that “A corporation J will be established to take charge of the dispatch of human resources to the victim L for cleaning the damaged area, etc., but if the Defendant borrowed KRW 20 million with the establishment capital, it would be repaid at least six months at the latest.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to use the money borrowed from the victim as the corporation capital or to repay it.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving it from the victim on the 12th of the same month, acquired 20 million won from the national bank account (Account Number: M) in the name of the Defendant.

2. The Defendant committed the crime of October 12, 2012 stated, at the K control point located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Buddhist District of Seoul around October 12, 2012, that “If a wife rents KRW 5 million to the victim L with the purchase cost of airline tickets, he/she would immediately repay the amount of KRW 70 million on the following day, he/she would be paid the amount of KRW 70 million on the following day.”

However, the defendant is true.