대여금
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the main claim added by this court are all dismissed.
2. After an appeal is filed.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff was an employee who assisted the Secretary General of F, and H was a representative attorney of F Law FirmF.
B. Around August 2009, H received a second freedom of neighboring land owners through G, and around August 2009, concluded a contract under the name of the law firmF with the content that “the cost of litigation, such as stamp, delivery fee, verification, appraisal cost, etc., necessary to handle delegated affairs, shall be paid immediately as you demanded,” with respect to the case of obstruction of air circulation, air pollution, complex malodor, and noise damage caused by the establishment by the second freedom of land owners (hereinafter “land owners”): 6% or 15% of the economic benefit value (less than 50 million won, less than 1.5%, less than 1 billion won, less than 1.2%, less than 1.5 billion won, less than 1.5 billion won, less than 3 billion won, and more than 3 billion won and more than 6%): The cost of litigation, such as stamp, delivery fee, verification, appraisal cost, etc., shall be paid immediately as you demanded.”
C. On December 9, 2009, H filed a lawsuit for damages (hereinafter “instant lawsuit”) against the Korea Land and Housing Corporation and the Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “instant lawsuit”). On December 22, 2010, H filed an application for on-site inspection and damage appraisal with the said court, as an attorney at the law firm F, on behalf of landowners, and the appraisal cost to be prepaid amounted to KRW 100 million.
The landowners collected money to raise the above appraisal costs, but failed to prepare only KRW 70,000,00,000, and H said that “Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhh’s payment of insufficient appraisal costs.”
On the other hand, the defendants, on behalf of land owners, bear the expenses for on-site verification and other actual expenses to be additionally borne when expanding the claim according to the result of appraisal in the future, such as stamp fees, service fees, etc., on behalf of the clients, in the execution of the lawsuit of this case, the clients are the top priority from the damages to be paid when they won the cost of lawsuit on behalf of the clients (10% added).