When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 20, 2015, at around 20:05, the Defendant: (a) stated that “F slope, a police officer of the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station E Zone E-gu, Incheon, requested a police officer to search for a dog,” and that “the immediately talking about the requested matters” from the police officers, the Defendant considered “I am hicker immediately about how I am hick? I am hicker? I am hicker? I am hicker? I am hicker? I am hicker? I am hicker? I am hicker F slope's hicker's hand with kicker's hand, hicker's breast part with his hand, Da hicker's hand, hicker's hand, and hicker's hand. I am hick.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment (in consideration of the initial offender);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;