A. Defendant Spoco Construction (hereinafter “Spoco Construction”) is a prime contractor that ordered the instant construction works in Yeongi-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun (hereinafter “the instant construction works”). Defendant Spoco Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Spoco Construction”) is a subordinate contractor that subcontracted some of the construction works from Defendant Spoco Construction.

B. On December 14, 201, the Plaintiff, who entered into an employment contract with Defendant Heung Construction on the fiveth floor at the construction site of the instant case, was injured by the Plaintiff on the ground that, in order to remove Bomult from the lower part of the work to remove Bomult in order to remove Bomult from the lower part of the work while performing the work of removing Bomult in the lower part of the construction site of the instant construction site, the Plaintiff was at the lower part of the Plaintiff’s timber, and was at the lower part of the Plaintiff’s 3rd structural frame, etc. by drillinging the Plaintiff’s floor.

(hereinafter referred to as this case). (c)

As a kind of fryp, the instant accident is a kind of fryp, and it has been done in the process of dismantling the fyp support unit after dismantling the fyp in the process of removing the fyp from concrete structures (hereinafter “instant rescission work”).

This case’s dismantling operations, in principle, remove ① fin in the support unit of oil pumps, ② remove the ground, ③ remove fin connecting the oil pumps from the upper part of the roof and the side of the side (loaks connected each other) and ④ remove them from the concrete, etc. with which the oil pumps are trained. The accident of this case is in the order of removal from the beam, etc. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 3578, Mar. 1, 2007> “A removal of fixed fin from the upper part and side of the oil pumps” ① removal of fin the support unit of the oil pumps, under the conditions that the oil pumps become weak with their connected power and power.”