beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.01.08 2018가합1940

정정보도

Text

1. The Defendant is an ordinary caption of a program broadcast within 7 days from the day this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a terrestrial broadcasting company that broadcasts "E", and the plaintiff is a doctor of G Hospital located in the Busan Metropolitan Transportation Daegu F (hereinafter "the plaintiff") in the hospital of this case.

B. On October 12, 2018, the Defendant made a report of the title H’s “H” (hereinafter “instant report”) from the “C” program broadcasted on October 12, 2018. The content of the instant report is as shown in attached Table 3.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, Eul evidence 14 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Defendant asserted by the Plaintiff through the instant report, thereby impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation by indicating false facts as indicated below.

Therefore, the Defendant is primarily obligated to make a corrective report, as indicated in the attached Form 2, as the measure under Article 14(1) of the Act on Press Arbitration and Remedies, etc. for Damage Caused by Press Reports (hereinafter “Act on Press Arbitration”) and as the measure under Article 16(1) of the Act on Press Arbitration, as stated in the attached Table 2, in the preliminary

(A) The Plaintiff is also subject to indirect enforcement on a corrective report or a counterargument report. ① The statement of number ① There was no problem about the health of the mother and fetus at all until the date of the surgery.

(2) Medical records have been prepared to the extent that investigation is impossible.

③ The hospital acknowledged that medical records were incomplete.

(4) Notwithstanding the police's request for on-site preservation, the operating room was immediately laid off.

5. I retired from his post.

[Attachment]

3. Determination

A. Article 14 of the Press Arbitration Act provides that “Any person who suffers damage due to the failure of a press report on his/her factual assertion” refers to a person who is designated from the content of the report or deemed to have an individual relationship with the content of the report, and the content of the report is not true.