개인정보보호법위반등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act was the actual operator of the Internet job offering and job seeking brokerage site B, and the personal information manager was prohibited from providing personal information to a third party without the consent of the subject of information. However, from June 2012 to November 2012, the Defendant joined the Internet job offering and job seeking brokerage site operated by the management company, as a fee member at the Internet job offering and job seeking brokerage site operated by the management company, and provided a large number of unspecified persons with access to B without the consent of the management of the Defendant by collecting more than 50 short-distance users, including 50 mobile phone numbers, and making registration with Defendant B’s job offerer and job seeker information.
As a personal information manager, the defendant provided personal information to a third party without the consent of the subject of information.
2. Around June 2012, the Defendant: (a) joined the victim’s company’s above part-time healthcare website as a fee member; (b) around June 2012.
However, the fact was that the defendant was admitted as a member for the purpose of collecting personal information, such as the name of the user of a short-diper and mobile phone numbers, not for the purpose of using a short-di
From June 2012 to November 2012, the Defendant collected more than 50 full-time users’ names, cell phone numbers, and other personal information from the victim who was unaware of the aforementioned facts, as prescribed in paragraph (1), and posted such information free of charge after registering the information in B without the consent of the part-time users, thereby allowing part-time users, who became aware of the fact that their personal information was provided to others without permission, to make an objection against the victimized company or to discontinue the use of the above part-time healthcare.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's above part-time management work by fraudulent means.
Summary of Evidence
1..