사기
Defendant
A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for 6 months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000.
Punishment of the crime
F Limited Liability Company G (formerly, Limited Liability Company G) is a juristic person that operates sand gathering ship I (1,575 tons) and J (1,538 tons) with its head office in Yong-Namnam A, and Defendant A is the representative director who has overall control over the above F Limited Liability Company from July 13, 2007 to that day. Defendant B is a general executive director in charge of vessel management and aggregate sales from the above F Limited Liability Company from July 2006 to that day, and Defendant C is a certified architect in the K-U.K. who is to issue a verification report after measuring the load capacity of the ship.
In 2012, the Busan Regional Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Office ordered the "L Coastal Maintenance Project" for the purpose of preventing sand loss of L and expanding tourism infrastructure, and the FF limited liability company, as a company permitted to collect sand, supplied sand to Soksan Construction Business Co., Ltd., a sand supplier of the above coastal maintenance project and M.
1. Defendant A and Defendant B paid only management expenses [1CBM (V) 1,580 won per 1CBM) to the victim in advance of and after the actual collection of complex management expenses in proportion to the quantity permitted in the West Sea EZ waters, which are the zone subject to the permission of the Korea Water Resources Corporation for the extraction of water resources. Defendant A instructed Defendant B to reduce the amount of loading expenses listed in the above I and J’s verification report to maximize the profits and accordingly reduce the amount of loading expenses paid in advance by deceiving the victim. Defendant B requested Defendant B to reduce the amount of loading expenses on January 1, 201, and Defendant B, despite being aware of the reduced amount of loading expenses, submitted 9C's false verification report, etc., Defendant B, despite being aware of the reduced amount of loading expenses, submitted 9C's false verification report.