2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. The Plaintiff is a Korean legal entity that manufactures and sells chemical medicine, etc., and the co-Defendant B Co-Defendant B Co-Defendant B (hereinafter “B”) of the first instance trial is a California legal entity that develops and sells radio security software technology. The Defendant was the professor of H University Department and the representative director B from July 2001 to July 201.

B. On June 24, 2000, the Plaintiff and B (the Defendant represented B) entered into a share purchase agreement (Sock Purcse A, hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the Plaintiff to purchase 4 million U.S. dollars 2,000,000 US dollars for the purpose of investing in the development of radio security software technology in B, which includes the following: (a) the instant agreement (Evidence A) includes the Plaintiff and B’s contractual parties:

13.1 준거법(Governing Law) 본 계약상의 모든 의무의 해석, 유효성, 이행과 본 계약과 관련하여 발생하는 모든 클레임을 포함한 모든 측면은, 미국 캘리포니아주법에 따라 적용되고 해석된다(This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in all respects in accordance with the laws of the State of California of the United States, including all matters of construction, validity and performance of all contractual obligations of this Agreement as well as all claims arising in relation to or out of this Agreement). 13.2 중재(Arbitration) 본 계약으로부터 또는 본 계약에 관련되어 당사자 간의 분쟁이나 상대방에 대한 클레임이 발생할 경우 협상을 통해 최대한 우호적으로 해결한다. 만약 그렇게 못할 경우, 미국 중재위원회의 현행 규칙에 의거하여 중재(분쟁을 해결하기 위한 배타적인 방법으로서)를 통하여 최종적으로 결정된다 In the event that any dispute between the parties hereto or claim by a party...