However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 20:20 on December 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report from the Jeju Western Police Station D District Standon, which called the Defendant on December 27, 2013, to encourage the Defendant to return to the Defendant while avoiding disturbance, such as continuing sound to enter the said house, breaking up the door, breaking up the door, and breaking up the door, and obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties, such as plucking up three times at around 102, and plucking up to 112, by plucking up the door of the Jeju Western Police Station D District Standon, which called the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] (decision of a special person who has been sentenced] (decision of a sentence] A criminal record of being sentenced to a fine due to obstruction of performance of official duties, circumstances of the crime, age of the defendant, character and conduct, health conditions, etc.