공무집행방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 22:40 on July 17, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., refusal to measure drinking), while driving a car in Ecco under the influence of alcohol in front of the “D cafeteria” located in Ecco in Ecco, Ecco, which could be faced with F’s car and the vehicle. In short, the Defendant was driving a car in Ecco with the real estate consulting office of G in Ecco.
On July 17, 2017, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as sniffing the Defendant on the face, when the Defendant she sniffeded the Defendant from the Leecheon-gu Police Station HH district unit in the Gyeonggi-do Police Station and from the GJ on July 23:0, 2017, after receiving a report that drinking would be doubtful.
On July 17, 2017, when there are reasonable grounds to determine a seal, it was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting the whole in a drinking measuring instrument three times from that time until July 17, 2017.
Nevertheless, the defendant avoided this and did not comply with the police officer's request for a drinking test without any justifiable reason.
2. On July 17, 2017, at the same place as around 23:21 on July 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was defective in arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender in violation of the Road Traffic Act by police officers J(44 years old); (b) police officers, I; and (c) KK, etc., working for the Gyeonggi-do Police Station H District; and (d) resisting the Defendant.
There is a police officer among the flachis and family members.
There is no arrest of dogs, scars, and scars.
In addition, it does not constitute a crime of internal death, and it does not cause damage to South Korea, and it does not cause damage to South Korea. why is why is why is, the flab Maz in the magazine.
“In doing so, the left part of the left part of the J’s right margin was over the floor.”
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's statement in court;