The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

The judgment below

According to its reasoning, the lower court determined that the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone was insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff was a party to the instant sales contract.

In light of the records, the above determination by the court below is just, and there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the confirmation of

In addition, as long as such determination by the lower court is justifiable, the legitimacy of the lower court’s additional determination as to the delegation of the authority to receive the purchase price and the refund of KRW 750 million cannot affect the conclusion of the judgment. Therefore, the allegation in the grounds of appeal on this issue cannot be accepted without the need for further review.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.