beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.12.05 2017고정206

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 High 206]

1. On May 24, 201, the Defendant, against the victim B, up to May 24, 201, posted the content of “Ecocon on the bulletin board of the Internet Internet Nene “China” website.

“To send the above content to the victim who sent the text message to the victim who reported and sent the text message.”

The message sent a false text message.

However, even if the defendant did not have the above contents and received money from the injured party, he did not have an intention or ability to pay the above contents to the injured party.

The Defendant received 80,000 won from a post office account (Account Number C) in the name of the Defendant around 16:20 on the same day from the injured party.

2. On May 25, 201, the Defendant against the victim D was aware of the coo high pressure of coo in a bulletin board, such as the statement of paragraph (1) around May 25, 201.

“To call this writing to report it to the victim who left comments on the comments, and send the above pressure to the victim, who, in turn, remitted money.”

The message sent a false text message.

However, even if the defendant did not have the above pressure and received money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to cause the above pressure.

The Defendant received 40,000 won from the injured party to the same account as described in paragraph (1) at around 09:13 on the same day.

[2017 High 207]

3. On May 24, 201, the criminal defendant against the victim E access to the high-level foreign cameras among the Internet NAVV website on May 24, 201 and up to KRW 90,000.

The phrase " shall be posted and shall be sent to the victim who reported and contacted with "80,000 won".

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, since the defendant did not have the U.S. monetary content at the time, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the monetary content.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and amounts to the same day from the victim.