공사대금
1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiff's claim extended by this court, shall be modified as follows:
. In the instant case, G corresponds to the material identified by G based on the photographs taken at the time of the on-site investigation, but such quantity is presumed to have been based on the quantity claimed by Defendant B by way of a specific impossibility of being identified by pictures, referring to the completed part of the instant construction and the unexecution part.
In addition, in the case of the Sejong poppy, G arbitrarily calculated the unit price on the grounds that its size is unclear, and there are circumstances in which G is impossible to use it due to erroneous storage methods, etc. in the case of stone scrap and cement part materials, it is reasonable to view the materials remaining inside the telecom at the time of rescission of the contract in this case as KRW 43,00,000, which is about 80% of the appraised value of the following specifications.
《내 역 서》 품명 규격 단위 수량 재료비 단가(원) 금액(원) 현무암 외벽, 600*1200 ㎡ 250 40,000 10,000,000 시멘트 40kg 포 100 4,000 400,000 모래 ㎥ 20 20,000 400,000 라임스톤 600*1200 ㎡ 200 27,000 5,400,000 화강석 황등석 계단, 30T ㎡ 150 35,000 5,250,000 석고보드 9.5T, 일반 매 8,000 2,965 23,720,000 세면대 앵글 L형강 조 50 25,000 1,250,000 방화문 SD 900*2100 EA 50 150,000 7,500,000 합계 53,920,000 ⑥ 피고 B는 위 자재 외에도 가설재(비계) 사용대금 상당액에 대해서도 상계를 주장하나, 원고가 피고 B를 상대로 이 사건 공사 현장에 설치된 비계에 대해 철거를 구하는 철거단행가처분을 제기하여 위 피고로 하여금 가설재를 철거하고 철거비용을 부담하라는 내용의 결정이 확정(전주지방법원 2016카합1075호)된 사실은 이 법원에 현저한 바 가설재 사용대금 상당의 상계 주장은 받아들이지 아니한다.
C) According to the theory of lawsuit, Defendant B’s return of unjust enrichment amounting to KRW 100,287,301 (i.e., 143,287,301) - offset of the amount of material cost by the amount of KRW 43,00,000, and the payment date after the final date of construction payment.