폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
1. The fact that the defendant tried to park his/her own vehicle by adding it to the wall of the electrical measuring instruments in order to block the Korea Electric Power Corporation staff D who intends to remove the summary of the grounds for appeal, but tried to shock the lane D;
Although there was no difference between D and D in fact, the judgment of the court below which recognized that the defendant had inflicted an injury by shocking D with lanes is erroneous in the misconception of facts.
Even if it is not so, the sentencing of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
가. 사실오인 주장에 대한 판단 살피건대, 원심이 적법하게 채택조사한 증거들, 특히 원심 증인 D, F의 각 법정진술에 의하면, 피고인이 공소사실 기재와 같이 피해자에게 욕을 하며 피고인 소유의 다마스 승합차를 후진시켰다가 다시 전진하면서, 차량 앞 조수석 부분으로 피해자의 오른쪽 다리 등을 충격한 사실이 넉넉히 인정되고, 여기에 피고인은 당시 피해자가 차량 바로 앞에 붙어 전기계량기를 철거하려고 한 사실을 명확히 인식하고 있었던 점, 피고인도 검찰에서 피해자가 피고인의 중단요구에도 전기계량기 철거작업을 계속하자 차를 운전하여 부딪치는 시늉을 하려한 것이지 피해자를 충격하고자 한 것은 아니라고 설명하였던 점, 피고인이 당시 피해자를 향해 욕을 하며 위협적인 태도를 보였던 점을 보태어보면, 피고인이 차로 피해자를 충격하려고 한 고의 역시 넉넉히 인정된다.
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is difficult to accept.
B. We examine the argument of unfair sentencing, and examine the argument of unfair sentencing, that the defendant does not recognize the fact of his/her crime even though he/she intentionally shocked the victim, and that it does not seem to be arbitrative, such as misunderstanding the victim and the investigative agency only, and that this case is a statutory punishment for not less than three years, which is sentenced to imprisonment with labor.