The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the record, the court below was just in maintaining the court of first instance that acquitted the Defendants on the grounds that there was no proof of criminal facts as to the violation of the Political Funds Act among the facts charged in this case, and there was no violation of law by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or omitting judgment.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed against the guilty portion against Defendant B, but the appellate brief did not state the grounds for appeal, nor did the appellate brief state the grounds for objection.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.