except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Crane car.

On September 8, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car at around 10:45, and proceeded to turn to the right from the 3rd east-dong of Kupo-dong located in Busan Northern-dong.

Since the signal apparatus has been installed and the left-hand turn is an intersection, there was a duty of care for the driver of the vehicle to operate safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front portion of the E-high speed car driven by the victim D (the aged 35) who was driven by the victim D (the aged 35) under the new code from the Malar-dong on the right side of the car by negligence in violation of the signal.

The Defendant suffered from each injury to the victim F (V, 64 years of age) who was accompanied by the above victim D and the damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence, such as a finite finite and tension in need of medical treatment for about 3 weeks, and a chest G (V, 37 years of age) for the same victim G (V, 12 years of age) for about 12 weeks, such as a chest finite finite 12.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (which reflects the conflict of interest and the agreement with victims, etc.);