However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 22, 2013, at around 22:10, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with blood alcohol content of approximately 0.107% from the section of approximately 500 meters to the front road in front of the regular school located in the same mountain village in the same Dong-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and the statement on the state of drinking drivers;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that even if the defendant was sentenced to a fine due to drunk driving before the month when the defendant was in a bad condition, the defendant should be punished strictly. However, the defendant's mistake is against the defendant, the criminal record of the above drunk driving was a fine, and the sentence of suspended sentence is imposed on the condition that the order to attend a lecture is issued only once in consideration of various sentencing conditions.