1. On April 21, 2019, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim’s D Cargo Vehicles in Hong-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongnam on April 21, 2019; (b) opened and opened a door of the foregoing cargo vehicle that was not locked; and (c) cut off with one set of Ruk Kaz where the market price of the victim’s possession, including one million won in cash and one identification card, is unknown.

(2019 Highest 556). 2. around 19:04 on October 4, 2019, the Defendant entered a F parking lot located in Chungcheongnam-gun Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, with approximately KRW 5,00 of the market price, which is the victim’s ownership, and entered a 10 can or coffee with approximately KRW 5,00,000, in total, from October 14, 2019 to October 19, 2019.

(2019 order717) Summary of evidence / [2019 order 556]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. On-site photographs, photographs, CCTV images of a singing practice room, and clothes-to-face photographs at the time of committing a criminal suspect (2019No717);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of G and J;

1. Application of each on-site photograph and CCTV photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Scope of recommending punishment based on the sentencing guidelines for the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes; and

(a) Each crime (a decision on a punishment) (a) thief for general property; (b) thief for general property; and (c) thief for general property (type 2) : In the area of mitigation of punishment (a person who is a special person) : In the area of mitigation of punishment (the scope of recommending and recommending punishment) ; and April to October

B. Extent of recommendation according to the standards for handling multiple crimes: April to June 10 (1/3 of the upper limit of crimes No. 1/2) of imprisonment with prison labor; the frequency and amount of the instant crime; the defendant committed several crimes during the period of suspension of execution, even though he/she was sentenced to a suspended sentence due to a similar crime; and the victims committed several crimes.