When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 23, 2015, the Defendant reported 112 on the ground that the taxi was taken out in front of the C convenience store located in Busan Jung-gu, Busan, on the ground that the taxi was taken out while he was trying to get a taxi, and that the above taxi driver was taken off.

The Defendant, upon receipt of the above report, expressed that E and the police officer E and the police officer F of the Jungbu Police Station, who were called the Defendant’s report, asked the Defendant about the details of the report. The Defendant: (a) expressed that the Defendant: (b) took the bath that the Defendant “Schch son,” and (c) carried the chests of the above E and F, in hand, carried the Defendant’s hand, and carried the arms.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of police officers dispatched;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;