When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 30, 2014, at around 01:39, the Defendant heard questions about the circumstances of the instant case from 19 work slope F (the age of 40) of the Seongbuk-gu Police Station Eab, which was called “I would like to listen to the question from the Escoping F (the age of 40) of the instant case, within the main points of the operation of C, in 01:39, on December 30, 2014, and called “I would know that I would scopice, I would like to scopice, I would like to say I would like to say I would like to “I would like to scopble, I would like to scopble, I would like to say I would like to interfere with the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties on the handling of 112 reports by taking the left copher of the said F

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of a fine (including the reflection of the accused and the degree of obstruction of performance

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;