A. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the misunderstanding of the fact that he did not administer philophones as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment, is erroneous in the misapprehension of the facts and affected the

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment, additional collection KRW 100,00) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant was urgently arrested as the crime of this case on July 22, 2016 by the police officer who was reported to 112 and called out after receiving a report at around 110:00 on July 22, 2016. The appraisal by the National Scientific Research Institute on the urine submitted by the defendant at his own discretion at around 12:0 on the same day after arrest, me found the me to find the mecacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacs in the Defendant’s me, ② upon diagnosis of the mecacacacasis and C mecacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacs, and the defendant was found to have detected or detected by the me.

The statements were made.

In full view of the facts stated in the judgment below, the judgment of the court below that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is recognized as having administered phiphones as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment.