beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.04.23 2014고단2031

부정수표단속법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From June 8, 1990, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the new bank opposite to the former bank in the name of the Defendant and entered into a check transaction.

[2014 Highest 2031] around December 26, 2013, the Defendant issued a check number D, face value 5,000,000, and issuance date of the above bank check under the name of the Defendant as of May 31, 2014, and issued one copy of the above bank check under the name of the Defendant around May 31, 2014, and around that time, each of the following methods: (a) issued the attached Table 1 Nos. 2 through 6, 8, and 14; and (b) presented a payment proposal within the period for payment; (c) each of the holders presented a payment proposal within the period for each deposit or transaction suspension, but no payment was made.

[2014 Highest 2944] On March 5, 2014, the Defendant issued a check number G, face value G, 5,000,000 won, and issued a one copy of the bank household check under the name of the Defendant, which was the date of issuance August 10, 2014, at the F Office operated by the Defendant located in Gwangju-si, as shown in the attached Table 2 No. 1, at the F Office operated by the Defendant located in Gwangju-si, and presented the payment during the payment proposal period, but the Defendant did not receive due to the cancellation of the check contract.

[2014 Highest 3280] On March 5, 2014, the Defendant issued a check number H, face value 5,000,000, and one check issued under the name of the Defendant on August 15, 2014 at the F office operated by the Defendant located in Gwangju-si, and issued one check under the name of the Defendant on August 15, 2014, and around that time, issued one check under the name of the Defendant at the above bank under the name of the Defendant, and presented a payment proposal within the payment proposal period, but each holder did not receive due to the termination of each check contract.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Application of each statute on a written accusation;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act with regard to the facts constituting an offense and Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Act on the Prevention of Illegal Check

1. Concurrent Crimes.